Security Audit Checklist
Security Audit Checklist
Section titled “Security Audit Checklist”Overview
Section titled “Overview”This checklist guides security auditors through the SIP protocol codebase, highlighting critical areas for review.
Pre-Audit Information
Section titled “Pre-Audit Information”Repository Structure
Section titled “Repository Structure”packages/├── sdk/ # Core SDK (PRIMARY AUDIT TARGET)│ ├── src/│ │ ├── commitment.ts # Pedersen commitments│ │ ├── stealth.ts # Stealth addresses (EIP-5564)│ │ ├── privacy.ts # Viewing keys│ │ ├── intent.ts # Intent builder│ │ ├── sip.ts # Main client│ │ └── proofs/ # Proof providers│ │ ├── interface.ts│ │ └── mock.ts│ └── tests/ # Test coverage├── types/ # Type definitions└── circuits/ # Noir ZK circuits ├── funding_proof/ ├── validity_proof/ └── fulfillment_proof/Dependencies
Section titled “Dependencies”| Dependency | Version | Purpose | Audit Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| @noble/curves | ^1.3.0 | ECC operations | Audited (Trail of Bits) |
| @noble/hashes | ^1.3.3 | Hash functions | Audited (Trail of Bits) |
| Noir | 1.0.0-beta.15 | ZK circuits | Aztec-maintained |
Entry Points
Section titled “Entry Points”createSIP()- SDK initializationintent()- Intent buildergenerateStealthKeys()- Key generationcommit()- Commitment creationgenerateProof()- Proof generation
Checklist
Section titled “Checklist”1. Key Generation and Handling
Section titled “1. Key Generation and Handling”1.1 Random Number Generation
Section titled “1.1 Random Number Generation”- File:
commitment.ts:generateBlinding() - Verify uses
crypto.getRandomValues() - Check for rejection sampling (values >= curve order)
- Verify no fallback to weak RNG
// Expected patternconst bytes = crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(32))// Should reject if >= curve order- File:
stealth.ts:generateStealthMetaAddress() - Private key generation uses secure random
- No key reuse between spending/viewing keys
1.2 Key Storage
Section titled “1.2 Key Storage”- Keys never logged or console.logged
- Keys not stored in global state
- Session storage cleared appropriately
1.3 Key Derivation
Section titled “1.3 Key Derivation”- File:
stealth.ts:deriveStealthPrivateKey() - ECDH uses validated points
- Hash output properly reduced mod n
- No timing leaks in derivation
2. Commitment Scheme
Section titled “2. Commitment Scheme”2.1 NUMS Generator
Section titled “2.1 NUMS Generator”- File:
commitment.ts:getH()(or similar) - H is derived from hash-to-curve
- Derivation is deterministic and documented
- No discrete log relation to G is known
// Expected: H = try-and-increment over SHA-256("SIP-PEDERSEN-GENERATOR-H-v1:<counter>")2.2 Commitment Creation
Section titled “2.2 Commitment Creation”- File:
commitment.ts:commit() - Value range validation (0 ≤ v < n)
- Blinding factor is fresh random or provided
- Point multiplication is constant-time (via noble/curves)
2.3 Commitment Verification
Section titled “2.3 Commitment Verification”- File:
commitment.ts:verifyOpening() - Recomputes commitment from opening
- Uses constant-time comparison
- Handles edge cases (zero value, etc.)
2.4 Homomorphic Operations
Section titled “2.4 Homomorphic Operations”- File:
commitment.ts:addCommitments() - Point addition is correct
- File:
commitment.ts:subtractCommitments() - Handles identity point (result of C - C)
- Blinding operations match commitment operations
3. Stealth Address Protocol
Section titled “3. Stealth Address Protocol”3.1 Meta-Address Generation
Section titled “3.1 Meta-Address Generation”- File:
stealth.ts:generateStealthMetaAddress() - Spending and viewing keys are independent
- Public keys are correctly derived
- Format matches EIP-5564 specification
3.2 Stealth Address Derivation
Section titled “3.2 Stealth Address Derivation”- File:
stealth.ts:generateStealthAddress() - Ephemeral key is fresh random
- ECDH performed correctly: S = r·K_view
- Scalar derivation: s = H(S)
- Address computation: P = K_spend + s·G
3.3 Address Checking
Section titled “3.3 Address Checking”- File:
stealth.ts:checkStealthAddress() - View tag optimization is correct
- Full verification when view tag matches
- No information leakage in negative case
3.4 Private Key Recovery
Section titled “3.4 Private Key Recovery”- File:
stealth.ts:deriveStealthPrivateKey() - Correctly computes: p = k_spend + H(k_view·R)
- Result matches stealth address public key
- No timing variance based on input
4. Proof System
Section titled “4. Proof System”4.1 Proof Interface
Section titled “4.1 Proof Interface”- File:
proofs/interface.ts - All proof types defined (funding, validity, fulfillment)
- Input validation on all parameters
- Error handling doesn’t leak sensitive info
4.2 Mock Provider (Development)
Section titled “4.2 Mock Provider (Development)”- File:
proofs/mock.ts - Clearly marked as NOT FOR PRODUCTION
- Cannot be accidentally used in production
- Validates inputs even in mock mode
4.3 Noir Circuits
Section titled “4.3 Noir Circuits”-
Directory:
circuits/funding_proof/- Correct constraint on balance ≥ minimum
- Commitment verification is sound
- Public inputs properly defined
-
Directory:
circuits/validity_proof/- Signature verification is correct
- Nullifier derivation prevents replay
- Time bounds enforced
-
Directory:
circuits/fulfillment_proof/- Output amount ≥ minimum verified
- Time bounds checked
- Commitment correctly verified
5. Intent Handling
Section titled “5. Intent Handling”5.1 Intent Builder
Section titled “5.1 Intent Builder”- File:
intent.ts:IntentBuilder - All fields validated before building
- Intent ID generation is unique
- Privacy level correctly set
5.2 Intent Signing
Section titled “5.2 Intent Signing”- Intent hash covers all fields
- Signature scheme is ECDSA (secp256k1)
- Replay protection via nonce/nullifier
5.3 Intent Verification
Section titled “5.3 Intent Verification”- Signature verification before processing
- Expiry time checked
- Privacy requirements enforced
6. Privacy Features
Section titled “6. Privacy Features”6.1 Viewing Keys
Section titled “6.1 Viewing Keys”- File:
privacy.ts - Cannot derive spending key from viewing key
- Hierarchical derivation is correct
- Child keys cannot derive siblings/parents
6.2 Privacy Levels
Section titled “6.2 Privacy Levels”- TRANSPARENT: No privacy (baseline)
- SHIELDED: Full privacy (commitments + stealth)
- COMPLIANT: Privacy with viewing key disclosure
7. Error Handling
Section titled “7. Error Handling”7.1 Error Messages
Section titled “7.1 Error Messages”- Errors don’t reveal sensitive data
- Timing is uniform across error paths
- No stack traces in production
7.2 Input Validation
Section titled “7.2 Input Validation”- All external inputs validated
- Type checking enforced
- Range checks for numeric values
8. Test Coverage
Section titled “8. Test Coverage”8.1 Unit Tests
Section titled “8.1 Unit Tests”-
tests/crypto/pedersen.test.ts- 29 tests -
tests/crypto/stealth.test.ts- 21 tests -
tests/proofs/mock-provider.test.ts- 21 tests
8.2 Integration Tests
Section titled “8.2 Integration Tests”-
tests/integration/full-flow.test.ts- 16 tests
8.3 Edge Cases
Section titled “8.3 Edge Cases”- Zero values handled
- Maximum values handled
- Invalid inputs rejected
9. Side-Channel Resistance
Section titled “9. Side-Channel Resistance”9.1 Timing
Section titled “9.1 Timing”- Constant-time ECC operations (noble/curves)
- Constant-time comparisons for secrets
- No early returns based on secret data
9.2 Memory
Section titled “9.2 Memory”- Keys zeroized after use (implemented v0.1.1)
- No heap spraying vulnerabilities
- Garbage collection considerations
Severity Classifications
Section titled “Severity Classifications”| Severity | Description |
|---|---|
| Critical | Direct loss of funds or privacy |
| High | Indirect path to fund/privacy loss |
| Medium | Security degradation |
| Low | Best practice violations |
| Informational | Suggestions and notes |
Reporting Template
Section titled “Reporting Template”## Finding: [Title]
**Severity**: Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational
**Location**: `packages/sdk/src/file.ts:line`
**Description**:[Detailed description of the issue]
**Impact**:[What could happen if exploited]
**Proof of Concept**:[Steps or code to reproduce]
**Recommendation**:[How to fix]Contact
Section titled “Contact”For questions during audit:
- Repository: https://github.com/sip-protocol/sip-protocol
- Issues: Use GitHub issues with “security” label
Post-Audit
Section titled “Post-Audit”After audit completion:
- All Critical/High findings must be fixed
- Medium findings should be fixed or documented
- Re-audit of fixes recommended
- Public disclosure timeline agreed